Home

Welcome! Our content is currently primarily available in German. For your convenience, please use the translation tool in the top navigation bar to translate this page and all subsequent pages into your preferred language.

Electrosensitivity is recognized in Sweden, Canada, and the Netherlands.

Electrosensitivity (historically referred to as “microwave sickness”) has been recognized in Sweden as a “physical impairment” since 1995 and has been an officially recognized functional disability (triggered by environmental factors) since 2002. The Swedish perspective offers individuals with this impairment maximum legal protection. Protective measures are funded by the state. Consequently, electrosensitive individuals have not only a right to support but also the right to an electrosmog-free workplace (any necessary retrofitting is financed by the employer).

Furthermore, municipalities provide housing in non-burdened areas. Affected individuals also have priority rental rights in areas with low radiation levels. Additionally, hospitals offer radiation-free treatment rooms for affected patients. In many countries, precautionary measures against radiation exposure are also taken to protect children (France, Belgium, Austria, Malta). Link to iopscience.iop.org

Legal status regarding EHS in Sweden can be found [here]. In Canada, EHS is recognized by the “Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse du Québec” and the Canadian Human Rights Commission.

The Netherlands | Recognition of EHS in the Netherlands (Dec. 2023). The Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport (VWS) has recognized EHS as an official disability. stralingsbewust.info

Calabria (Italy) | On March 12, 2024, fibromyalgia and electrosensitivity were officially recognized.

Recognition of Electromagnetic Sensitivity as a disability under the ADA

“The Committee recognizes that multiple chemical and electromagnetic sensitivities can be considered disabilities under the ADA when they substantially impair a person’s neurological, respiratory, or other functions, thereby significantly limiting one or more of a person’s major life activities.” Americans suffering from EHS have a functional disability, as they are hindered by artificial electro-toxins in their environment. Negative symptoms resulting from these environmental toxins often prevent EHS sufferers from accessing public accommodations.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) is a civil rights law that prohibits discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Furthermore, unlike the general Civil Rights Act, the ADA mandates that covered employers provide reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities and stipulates accessibility requirements for public accommodations.

  • Protective housing in Zurich: A protected building is available in Zurich for those suffering from EHS and MCS, where the use of Wi-Fi and mobile phones is strictly prohibited.
  • Advocacy in North America: Numerous initiatives and proclamations by local and regional authorities in the USA and Canada are pushing for the recognition of these environmental illnesses.
  • Precedent in Paris: Wi-Fi was removed from 4 Parisian libraries after more than 40 employees began suffering from health issues (such as headaches, dizziness, visual disturbances, and insomnia). It was only after pressure from the Supap labor union that the authorities finally shut down the networks.

The desperate search for a “white zone”

An increasing number of people are experiencing severe symptoms when living in the presence of mobile phones, cell towers, Wi-Fi, or even common household electrical currents. To protect themselves, they are forced to shield their homes, move away, or—even worse—leave their families and give up their careers.

Twenty years ago, this phenomenon was virtually unknown. Today, it is a global crisis.

This investigation reveals that the symptoms described are eerily similar to the “Microwave Syndrome” once documented in professional radar operators. The technologies involved are nearly identical, and the harmful side effects have been documented for over 50 years. For reasons that are not yet fully understood, men, women, and even children are developing a debilitating intolerance to the artificial electromagnetic fields that now permeate our daily environment on a massive scale.

Watch the Trailer:

Where can someone go when they are no longer able to live in an environment saturated with artificial electromagnetic fields? This question is at the heart of Marc Khanne’s documentary. After three years of intensive research and over 60 interviews with affected individuals, this film provides an essential look into the reality of electrohypersensitivity (EHS).

I highly recommend this documentary to anyone seeking a deeper understanding of the environmental and health impacts of modern wireless technology. It is a vital resource for those who want to move beyond the surface and listen to the experiences of those affected. vimeo.com | film-documentaire.fr

About the Film:

  • Director: Marc Khanne
  • Content: 58-minute documentary feature + 4 bonus films
  • Synopsis: Due to the global explosion of artificial electromagnetic waves, many individuals are seeing their health and social lives severely impacted. This film gives them a voice. Rather than questioning the validity of their experiences, it invites us to listen to those who live with this reality every day.
  • Official Project Website: electrosensible-zone-blanche-ehs-film.com

2022: Recognition by the European Union (EU) as a medical condition

EU Official Journal, March 2022, p. 38, 4.13: “The European Parliament, the EESC, and the Council of Europe have recognized that electrosensitivity is a medical condition. A number of people are affected by this, and with the introduction of 5G, which requires a much higher density of electronic installations, this condition could become more frequent.” eur-lex.europa.eu (Official Journal 2022/C 105/06)]

  • In 2009, the European Parliament “called on the Member States to follow the example of Sweden and to recognize persons who suffer from electrosensitivity as disabled, in order to grant them adequate protection and equal opportunities.”
  • In 2011, the Council of Europe demanded “to pay particular attention to electrosensitive persons, who suffer from a syndrome of intolerance to electromagnetic fields, to protect them, including the creation of radiation-free areas that are not covered by wireless networks.” Resolution 1815
  • The Committee on the Environment of the Council of Europe is very specific regarding health risks; it recommended “banning all mobile phones, DECT telephones, Wi-Fi or WLAN systems in schools and classrooms.” The mobile communications industry opposed these recommendations in the document. futurezone.at
  • Report to the German Bundestag: The Committee on Education, Research, and Technology Assessment submitted a report to the Bundestag. In the parliamentary document 2003 (Bundestag.de), page 27 states regarding mobile radiation: “79% of studies on human subjects produced positive findings. Most effects concern the nervous system or the brain (86%), followed by effects related to cancer (64%).” This means that effects were detectable in 79% of the subjects. On page 24: “Of particular interest is a publication concerning cattle (Löscher/Käs 1998), in which significantly reduced milk yields, emaciation, as well as spontaneous miscarriages and stillbirths were documented.”

2023: Medical Center “MedNIS” for Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity opened

Switzerland | In September 2023, the medical center “MedNIS” (Swiss Network for Medical Advice on Non-Ionizing Radiation) was inaugurated under the direction and coordination of Dr. Diana Walther to support individuals suffering from electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Patients can now receive care from trained specialists.

To improve medical support for EHS individuals, the Federal Office for the Environment (BAFU) commissioned the Institute of Family Medicine at the University of Fribourg to establish a medical advisory structure. The primary goal of MedNIS is to improve medical care for EHS patients, while also providing better information to the medical community and the general public regarding electrohypersensitivity. The organization also conducts scientific research on the subject. Individuals suffering from symptoms they attribute to the presence of electromagnetic fields can contact the center for expert guidance. mednis.ch

  • it-markt.ch | Advisory center for electrosensitive individuals begins operations
  • admin.ch | Protection against mobile phone radiation: Opening of the advisory center

Electrosensitivity is recognized in multiple court rulings

  • France (2015): A court recognized electrosensitivity as a severe disability and granted financial support to Marine Richard, a 39-year-old journalist. lemonde.fr
  • France (2019): A court recognized a research technician’s intolerance to electromagnetic waves as an occupational disease. eurogip.fr
  • Spain (2016): The High Court of Madrid recognized the permanent disability of a telecommunications engineer (Ricardo de Francisco) due to electrosensitivity. In recent years, several court rulings in Spain have granted disability status to individuals suffering from electrosensitivity.
  • France (Smart Meters): A French court ordered the removal of “Linky” smart meters for medical reasons after homeowners reported adverse health effects. connexionfrance.com
  • Italy (Brain Tumor): A court granted a lifetime pension to a man whose brain tumor was medically linked to mobile phone radiation. nzz.ch

WHO: “Possibly carcinogenic”

In 2011, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Organization (WHO) classified high-frequency electromagnetic fields as “possibly carcinogenic” to humans (Group 2B), citing an increased risk for gliomas, a type of malignant brain tumor. This classification was reaffirmed in 2002. This category includes substances such as lead, DDT, pesticides, and chloroform.

Furthermore, the WHO maintains the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), a globally recognized system for medical diagnostics. Electrosensitivity is listed in the ICD catalog under Code Z58. Consequently, EHS is a medically diagnosable condition recognized by health insurance providers.

The Microwave Syndrome (1932)

The “Microwave Syndrome” was first described in Eastern European countries during the 1960s and 1970s. The condition primarily affected neural, cardiovascular, and endocrine functions. Studies on exposed workers revealed that non-thermal microwave exposure triggered symptoms such as headaches, a sensation of pressure in the head, dizziness, sleep disturbances, anxiety, as well as problems with attention and memory. An evaluation of these studies, along with animal experiments, concluded that exposure to non-thermal RF/microwave radiation can be expected to cause “a surprisingly wide variety of neurological and physiological reactions.”

Pulsing: Non-thermal effects depend primarily on the modulation and/or pulsing of the signal, as well as on peak and average intensities. Pulsed signals and simultaneous exposure to multiple frequencies resulted in more pronounced effects and were therefore considered more hazardous. The observed effects increased in intensity with the duration of exposure. gavinpublishers.com

First described in 1932

Scientific knowledge regarding the effects of high-frequency waves (such as those used in today’s mobile technology) has existed for over eight decades. As early as 1932, Prof. Dr. Schliephake described what is known as the “Microwave Syndrome.” A decisive factor in how mobile communication frequencies affect living organisms is the fact that these technical frequencies lie exactly within the frequency ranges used by natural life to organize itself—via electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic waves through which cells and biological regulatory circuits communicate with one another. dr-homoeopathie.com | diagnose-funk.org (See right sidebar for original PDF documents)

Prof. em. Prof. Dr. med. habil. Karl Hecht († 23.09.2022) evaluated 878 Russian-language studies on behalf of the Federal Ministry of Telecommunications. The result: significant health-damaging effects from long-term microwave exposure. Since then, numerous scientific studies worldwide have repeatedly confirmed these findings and provided further evidence. diagnose-funk.org

Prof. em. Prof. Dr. med. habil. Karl Hecht: “Electrosensitivity is not a figment of the imagination – 5G and Wi-Fi are hazardous to health!”

Content: On the occasion of his 95th birthday, Professor Karl Hecht published a fundamental paper on the serious risks of rising radiation exposure. His work provides a comprehensive overview that remains accessible and understandable even for non-experts.

The author views his writing as an urgent appeal to our time: “Before it is too late—and there is not much time left to act correctly—as a physician, I wish to issue a serious, scientifically grounded warning that adheres to the truth.”

He describes his work as a “Scientifically grounded warning from a physician regarding the ‘mortal sins’ of a digitized humanity.”

This lecture was recorded on December 7, 2019, at the Mehrgenerationenhaus (Multi-generational House) in Gifhorn, Germany.

Documentary: “Ondes science et Manigances” (Waves, Science, and Schemes)

Description: A shocking investigation that uncovers the manipulation tactics of the mobile communications industry.

Across Europe, public distrust and protests against cell towers have increased significantly over the last decade. Yet, governments, industry leaders, and a portion of the scientific community continue to claim that current health standards (limit values) are sufficient to protect us.

This film (released in 2014) utilizes insights from whistleblowers, citizens, journalists, scientists, and elected officials to demonstrate how mobile phone manufacturers—much like the tobacco lobby before them—have developed a “product defense strategy.” This strategy intentionally creates artificial scientific doubt regarding the harmfulness of this technology to protect their economic interests. youtube.com

The Limit Value Fallacy

Current safety standards, including the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for mobile phones, only protect against tissue heating caused by radiation. These values are based solely on the thermal effects of microwave radiation. In other words, they are designed to protect against something that is not the primary danger of mobile phones and cell towers: heat.

Using heating as a benchmark for danger is equivalent to measuring the dose and impact of radioactive radiation on a nuclear power plant worker with a medical thermometer instead of a Geiger counter or a dosimeter.

The harmful effects occur consistently in the non-thermal range and therefore cannot be explained by temperature increases. The fact that limit values ignore non-thermal effects—and thus disregard biology entirely—demonstrates their absurdity. They neglect the essential factors that radiation exerts on human biology. diagnose-funk.org

Prof. Dr.-Ing. Alexander H. Volger: “The assertion that [these limit values] provide protective effects must be considered scientific misinformation. From a legal standpoint, this meets all the criteria of fraud and includes gross negligence to willful endangerment and bodily harm.” funkfrei.net

Documentary: “The Risks of Mobile Phone Radiation” (SPIEGEL TV)

Description: A report from the German news program SPIEGEL TV investigating the potential dangers of mobile phone radiation. Although this broadcast is from 2005, it provides an important historical perspective on the early warning signs regarding health risks that were identified long before the widespread deployment of 5G technology.

Video Details:

  • Source: SPIEGEL TV
  • Original Broadcast Date: December 4, 2005
  • Watch the Report: (Embed the YouTube video here)

Safety standards in the former GDR (East Germany)

During the era of the GDR, if the power density reached levels that are considered “safe” by today’s German standards, individuals were required to wear protective clothing.

According to the GDR Radiation Protection Ordinance (TLG 37816): “If there is a possibility that the power density to be measured exceeds 1 mW/cm² (= 10,000,000 µW/m²), the personnel conducting the measurements must wear protective clothing made of microwave-impermeable material. In particular, the eyes and the face must be protected.”. diagnose-funk.org

1967 NVA study on radio operators: Electrosensitivity was established scientific knowledge.

The narrative that “radio frequency radiation in the non-ionizing range is harmless” has accompanied the marketing of mobile communications since the 1990s. Prior to this, the risks were not a subject of controversy in medical literature. A study conducted by the NVA (National People’s Army of the former GDR) on radio operators clearly demonstrates the impact of this radiation on the human organism. The radio operators in this study became electrohypersensitive. diagnose-funk.org

Mobile Radiation: Cancer Risk & Industry Lobbyism

For over 25 years, research by Prof. Henry Lai (University of Washington) has shown that mobile phone radiation can cause DNA strand breaks—a precursor to cancer. Motorola responded immediately by consulting with the agency Burson & Marsteller on how to discredit these research findings. The result was the so-called “War Game Memo,” an internal strategic battle plan. This method—previously used by the tobacco industry in the 1990s to orchestrate scientific fraud—is the same strategy being applied by the mobile communications industry today. diagnose-funk.org

Trailer: “War-Gaming for Profit”

Description: A trailer for the documentary “War-Gaming for Profit – Mobile Radiation, Cancer Risk & Industry Lobbyism.”

This documentary exposes the strategies employed by the mobile communications industry to discredit critical scientists and suppress their explosive research findings regarding the adverse health effects of mobile phone radiation.

Documentary Details:

Years of waiting for official confirmation

Looking back: In the 1970s, despite intense public debate, the German Federal Health Office permitted the continued use of substances like asbestos, wood preservatives, formaldehyde, and PCBs for far too long. The official stance at the time was that there was “no definitive scientific proof” to justify restrictions. It was only after subsequent research in the 1980s that the authorities finally changed their course.

The consequences of the reckless use of these pollutants: tens of thousands of recognized occupational diseases and massive remediation costs for both public and private households.

Similarly, concerning “nuclear energy”—a term coined by the atomic lobby after the original label “atomic power” began to evoke negative associations in the public mind—it took many years for the public’s gathered insights to finally be confirmed by official sources. pulsstrahlung.de

European Academy for Environmental Medicine (EUROPAEM)

The European Academy for Environmental Medicine (EUROPAEM) compares the risk of non-ionizing radiation to other environmental hazards such as asbestos, benzene, and smoking. Regarding EMF (electromagnetic fields), the Academy explicitly recommends the application of the precautionary principle.

  • ec.europa.eu | EUROPAEM EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses

Swiss Re categorizes mobile radiation as a “High Risk”

Under the title “Unforeseeable consequences of electromagnetic fields,” one of the world’s largest reinsurers, Swiss Re, warns its clients about the potential risks posed by the product liability sector regarding mobile phones and transmission towers. Due to unforeseeable health consequences related to electromagnetic fields, the company anticipates significant claims for damages and large financial losses in product liability insurance for mobile phones and broadcasting infrastructure. naturalscience.org

Excerpt from Swiss Re (Translated)

“The omnipresence of electromagnetic fields (EMF) gives cause for concern regarding potential effects on human health, particularly with the use of mobile phones, power lines, or transmission antennas. Over the past decade, the proliferation of wireless devices has accelerated enormously. The convergence of mobile phones with computer technology has led to the spread of ever-newer technologies. This development has increased exposure to electromagnetic fields, the health effects of which are still unknown, and fear of potential risks associated with EMF has risen. Studies are difficult to conduct, as time-trend studies are inconsistent due to the still relatively recent deployment of wireless technology.

The WHO has classified extremely low-frequency magnetic fields and high-frequency electromagnetic fields, such as radiation from mobile phones, as potentially carcinogenic to humans (Class 2B). Furthermore, a recent Italian court ruling established a causal link between mobile phone radiation and impairment of human health. Overall, however, scientific studies on the potential harmful health effects of EMF are not yet conclusive. If a direct link between EMF and health problems were established, this would open the door for new claims and ultimately lead to significant losses in product liability insurance. Liability rates would likely rise.”

[Original Document (Page 12/27): link | Additional Report: pressebox.de]

Decreased Productivity in the Workplace

Electrosmog exposure is also a significant factor contributing to decreased productivity in the workplace, as well as higher rates of absenteeism due to illness and rising costs within the healthcare and social security systems. buergerwelle.de

Recommended Reading & Media Coverage

| Translate |